0.05/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 960 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 120 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 05:47:20 EDT 2022 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.43 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.16/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.16/0.44 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 16.33/2.51 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN. 16.33/2.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 16.33/2.51 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 600s (5) cores 16.33/2.51 # Starting post_as_ho3 with 120s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # Starting post_as_ho11 with 120s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # Starting full_lambda_8 with 120s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 18333 completed with status 0 16.33/2.51 # Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2 16.33/2.51 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN. 16.33/2.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 16.33/2.51 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 600s (5) cores 16.33/2.51 # No SInE strategy applied 16.33/2.51 # Search class: HGUNF-FFSF32-SHSSMSBN 16.33/2.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total) 16.33/2.51 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 361s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # Starting post_as_ho11 with 61s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # Starting full_lambda_5 with 61s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 61s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # Starting pre_casc_3 with 56s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # pre_casc_3 with pid 18344 completed with status 0 16.33/2.51 # Result found by pre_casc_3 16.33/2.51 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN. 16.33/2.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 16.33/2.51 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 600s (5) cores 16.33/2.51 # No SInE strategy applied 16.33/2.51 # Search class: HGUNF-FFSF32-SHSSMSBN 16.33/2.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total) 16.33/2.51 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 361s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # Starting post_as_ho11 with 61s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # Starting full_lambda_5 with 61s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 61s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # Starting pre_casc_3 with 56s (1) cores 16.33/2.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 16.33/2.51 # Presaturation interreduction done 16.33/2.51 16.33/2.51 # Proof found! 16.33/2.51 # SZS status Theorem 16.33/2.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_22, type, current_world: $i). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_23, type, prop_a: $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_24, type, prop_b: $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_25, type, prop_c: $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_26, type, mfalse: $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_27, type, mtrue: $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_28, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_29, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_30, type, mand: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_31, type, mimpl: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_32, type, miff: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_33, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_34, type, mdia: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_35, type, mall: (individuals > $i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_36, type, mexists: (individuals > $i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_37, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_38, type, msatisfiable: ($i > $o) > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_39, type, mcountersatisfiable: ($i > $o) > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_40, type, minvalid: ($i > $o) > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_41, type, rel: $i > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_42, type, icl_atom: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_43, type, icl_princ: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_44, type, icl_and: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_45, type, icl_or: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_46, type, icl_impl: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_47, type, icl_true: $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_48, type, icl_false: $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_49, type, icl_says: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_50, type, iclval: ($i > $o) > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_51, type, admin: $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_52, type, bob: $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_53, type, deletefile1: $i > $o). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_54, type, esk1_2: ($i > $o) > $i > $i). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_55, type, esk2_2: ($i > $o) > $i > $i). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_56, type, esk3_2: $i > $i > $i). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_57, type, esk4_2: $i > $i > $i). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_58, type, esk5_0: $i). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_59, type, esk6_0: $i). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_60, type, esk7_3: $i > $i > $i > $i). 16.33/2.51 thf(decl_61, type, esk8_3: $i > $i > $i > $i). 16.33/2.51 thf(mimpl, axiom, ((mimpl)=(^[X7:$i > $o, X8:$i > $o]:(mor @ (mnot @ X7) @ X8))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax', mimpl)). 16.33/2.51 thf(mnot, axiom, ((mnot)=(^[X2:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(~((X2 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax', mnot)). 16.33/2.51 thf(mor, axiom, ((mor)=(^[X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X4 @ X3)|(X5 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax', mor)). 16.33/2.51 thf(icl_atom, axiom, ((icl_atom)=(^[X11:$i > $o]:(mbox @ rel @ X11))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax', icl_atom)). 16.33/2.51 thf(mbox, axiom, ((mbox)=(^[X10:$i > $i > $o, X11:$i > $o, X1:$i]:(![X12:$i]:(((X10 @ X1 @ X12)=>(X11 @ X12)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax', mbox)). 16.33/2.51 thf(icl_impl, axiom, ((icl_impl)=(^[X19:$i > $o, X20:$i > $o]:(mbox @ rel @ (mimpl @ X19 @ X20)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax', icl_impl)). 16.33/2.51 thf(icl_says, axiom, ((icl_says)=(^[X19:$i > $o, X21:$i > $o]:(mbox @ rel @ (mor @ X19 @ X21)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax', icl_says)). 16.33/2.51 thf(icl_s4_valid, axiom, ((iclval)=(^[X22:$i > $o]:((mvalid @ X22)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax', icl_s4_valid)). 16.33/2.51 thf(mvalid, axiom, ((mvalid)=(^[X11:$i > $o]:(![X15:$i]:((X11 @ X15))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax', mvalid)). 16.33/2.51 thf(icl_princ, axiom, ((icl_princ)=(^[X11:$i > $o]:(X11))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax', icl_princ)). 16.33/2.51 thf(refl_axiom, axiom, ![X19:$i > $o]:((mvalid @ (mimpl @ (mbox @ rel @ X19) @ X19))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^1.ax', refl_axiom)). 16.33/2.51 thf(ax1, axiom, (iclval @ (icl_impl @ (icl_says @ (icl_princ @ admin) @ (icl_atom @ deletefile1)) @ (icl_atom @ deletefile1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax1)). 16.33/2.51 thf(ex1, conjecture, (iclval @ (icl_atom @ deletefile1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ex1)). 16.33/2.51 thf(ax2, axiom, (iclval @ (icl_says @ (icl_princ @ admin) @ (icl_impl @ (icl_says @ (icl_princ @ bob) @ (icl_atom @ deletefile1)) @ (icl_atom @ deletefile1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax2)). 16.33/2.51 thf(ax3, axiom, (iclval @ (icl_says @ (icl_princ @ bob) @ (icl_atom @ deletefile1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax3)). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_15, plain, ((mimpl)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2)))|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimpl])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_16, plain, ((mnot)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(~((Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_17, plain, ((mor)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2)|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_18, plain, ((icl_atom)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(![X25:$i]:(((rel @ Z1 @ X25)=>(Z0 @ X25)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_atom])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_19, plain, ((mbox)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X12:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2 @ X12)=>(Z1 @ X12)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_20, plain, ((icl_impl)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X26:$i]:(((rel @ Z2 @ X26)=>(((~((Z0 @ X26)))|(Z1 @ X26)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_impl])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_21, plain, ((mimpl)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2)))|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_17])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_22, plain, ((icl_says)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X27:$i]:(((rel @ Z2 @ X27)=>(((Z0 @ X27)|(Z1 @ X27)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_says])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_23, plain, ((iclval)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:((![X28:$i]:((Z0 @ X28)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_s4_valid])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_24, plain, ((mvalid)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(![X15:$i]:((Z0 @ X15))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_25, plain, ((icl_atom)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(![X25:$i]:(((rel @ Z1 @ X25)=>(Z0 @ X25)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_26, plain, ((icl_princ)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(Z0))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_princ])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_27, plain, ((icl_impl)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X26:$i]:(((rel @ Z2 @ X26)=>(((~((Z0 @ X26)))|(Z1 @ X26)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_19])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_28, plain, ((icl_says)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X27:$i]:(((rel @ Z2 @ X27)=>(((Z0 @ X27)|(Z1 @ X27)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_17]), c_0_19])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_29, plain, ((iclval)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:((![X28:$i]:((Z0 @ X28)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_30, plain, ![X19:$i > $o, X30:$i]:((~(![X29:$i]:(((rel @ X30 @ X29)=>(X19 @ X29))))|(X19 @ X30))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[refl_axiom, c_0_21]), c_0_19]), c_0_24])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_31, plain, ![X42:$i, X41:$i]:(((rel @ X42 @ X41)=>(~(![X39:$i]:(((rel @ X41 @ X39)=>((admin @ X39)|![X38:$i]:(((rel @ X39 @ X38)=>(deletefile1 @ X38)))))))|![X40:$i]:(((rel @ X41 @ X40)=>(deletefile1 @ X40)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax1, c_0_25]), c_0_26]), c_0_27]), c_0_28]), c_0_29])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ~(![X44:$i, X43:$i]:(((rel @ X44 @ X43)=>(deletefile1 @ X43)))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[ex1]), c_0_25]), c_0_29])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_33, plain, ![X51:$i > $o, X52:$i]:((((rel @ X52 @ (esk1_2 @ X51 @ X52))|(X51 @ X52))&(~(X51 @ (esk1_2 @ X51 @ X52))|(X51 @ X52)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])])])])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_34, plain, ![X62:$i, X63:$i, X66:$i]:((((rel @ X63 @ (esk3_2 @ X62 @ X63))|(~(rel @ X63 @ X66)|(deletefile1 @ X66))|~(rel @ X62 @ X63))&((~(admin @ (esk3_2 @ X62 @ X63))|(~(rel @ X63 @ X66)|(deletefile1 @ X66))|~(rel @ X62 @ X63))&(((rel @ (esk3_2 @ X62 @ X63) @ (esk4_2 @ X62 @ X63))|(~(rel @ X63 @ X66)|(deletefile1 @ X66))|~(rel @ X62 @ X63))&(~(deletefile1 @ (esk4_2 @ X62 @ X63))|(~(rel @ X63 @ X66)|(deletefile1 @ X66))|~(rel @ X62 @ X63)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])])])])])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ((rel @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)&~(deletefile1 @ esk6_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])])])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_36, plain, ![X50:$i, X49:$i]:(((rel @ X50 @ X49)=>((admin @ X49)|![X48:$i]:(((rel @ X49 @ X48)=>(~(![X46:$i]:(((rel @ X48 @ X46)=>((bob @ X46)|![X45:$i]:(((rel @ X46 @ X45)=>(deletefile1 @ X45)))))))|![X47:$i]:(((rel @ X48 @ X47)=>(deletefile1 @ X47))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax2, c_0_25]), c_0_26]), c_0_27]), c_0_28]), c_0_29])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_37, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X1:$i]:(((X2 @ X1)|~((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_38, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X1:$i]:(((rel @ X1 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X1))|(X2 @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_39, plain, ![X1:$i, X12:$i, X3:$i]:(((rel @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ X3) @ (esk4_2 @ X1 @ X3))|(deletefile1 @ X12)|~((rel @ X3 @ X12))|~((rel @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, (rel @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, ~((deletefile1 @ esk6_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_42, plain, ![X1:$i, X12:$i, X3:$i]:(((deletefile1 @ X12)|~((deletefile1 @ (esk4_2 @ X1 @ X3)))|~((rel @ X3 @ X12))|~((rel @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_43, plain, ![X69:$i, X70:$i, X71:$i, X74:$i]:((((rel @ X71 @ (esk7_3 @ X69 @ X70 @ X71))|(~(rel @ X71 @ X74)|(deletefile1 @ X74))|~(rel @ X70 @ X71)|(admin @ X70)|~(rel @ X69 @ X70))&((~(bob @ (esk7_3 @ X69 @ X70 @ X71))|(~(rel @ X71 @ X74)|(deletefile1 @ X74))|~(rel @ X70 @ X71)|(admin @ X70)|~(rel @ X69 @ X70))&(((rel @ (esk7_3 @ X69 @ X70 @ X71) @ (esk8_3 @ X69 @ X70 @ X71))|(~(rel @ X71 @ X74)|(deletefile1 @ X74))|~(rel @ X70 @ X71)|(admin @ X70)|~(rel @ X69 @ X70))&(~(deletefile1 @ (esk8_3 @ X69 @ X70 @ X71))|(~(rel @ X71 @ X74)|(deletefile1 @ X74))|~(rel @ X70 @ X71)|(admin @ X70)|~(rel @ X69 @ X70)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])])])])])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_44, plain, ![X12:$i, X3:$i, X1:$i]:(((rel @ X1 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X1))|(deletefile1 @ X12)|~((rel @ X1 @ X12))|~((rel @ X3 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_45, plain, ![X1:$i]:((rel @ X1 @ X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_46, plain, ![X1:$i, X12:$i, X3:$i]:(((deletefile1 @ X12)|~((admin @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ X3)))|~((rel @ X3 @ X12))|~((rel @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_47, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((rel @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ esk5_0) @ (esk4_2 @ X1 @ esk5_0))|~((rel @ X1 @ esk5_0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_40]), c_0_41])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((~((deletefile1 @ (esk4_2 @ X1 @ esk5_0)))|~((rel @ X1 @ esk5_0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42, c_0_40]), c_0_41])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_49, plain, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X13:$i, X12:$i]:(((rel @ X1 @ (esk7_3 @ X3 @ X12 @ X1))|(deletefile1 @ X13)|(admin @ X12)|~((rel @ X1 @ X13))|~((rel @ X12 @ X1))|~((rel @ X3 @ X12)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_50, plain, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:(((rel @ X1 @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ X1))|(deletefile1 @ X3)|~((rel @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_45])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_51, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((~((admin @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ esk5_0)))|~((rel @ X1 @ esk5_0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46, c_0_40]), c_0_41])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_52, plain, ![X37:$i, X36:$i]:(((rel @ X37 @ X36)=>((bob @ X36)|![X35:$i]:(((rel @ X36 @ X35)=>(deletefile1 @ X35)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax3, c_0_25]), c_0_26]), c_0_28]), c_0_29])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_53, plain, ![X1:$i, X13:$i, X12:$i, X3:$i]:(((rel @ (esk7_3 @ X1 @ X3 @ X12) @ (esk8_3 @ X1 @ X3 @ X12))|(deletefile1 @ X13)|(admin @ X3)|~((rel @ X12 @ X13))|~((rel @ X3 @ X12))|~((rel @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_54, negated_conjecture, (rel @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0) @ (esk4_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47, c_0_45])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_55, negated_conjecture, ~((deletefile1 @ (esk4_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48, c_0_45])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_56, plain, ![X1:$i, X13:$i, X12:$i, X3:$i]:(((deletefile1 @ X13)|(admin @ X3)|~((bob @ (esk7_3 @ X1 @ X3 @ X12)))|~((rel @ X12 @ X13))|~((rel @ X3 @ X12))|~((rel @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_57, plain, ![X1:$i, X13:$i, X12:$i, X3:$i]:(((deletefile1 @ X13)|(admin @ X3)|~((deletefile1 @ (esk8_3 @ X1 @ X3 @ X12)))|~((rel @ X12 @ X13))|~((rel @ X3 @ X12))|~((rel @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_58, plain, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X12:$i]:(((rel @ X1 @ (esk7_3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X1))|(deletefile1 @ X12)|(admin @ X1)|~((rel @ X3 @ X1))|~((rel @ X1 @ X12)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49, c_0_45])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_59, negated_conjecture, (rel @ esk5_0 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50, c_0_40]), c_0_41])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_60, negated_conjecture, ~((admin @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51, c_0_45])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_61, plain, ![X59:$i, X60:$i, X61:$i]:((~(rel @ X59 @ X60)|((bob @ X60)|(~(rel @ X60 @ X61)|(deletefile1 @ X61))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_52])])])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_62, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:(((rel @ (esk7_3 @ X1 @ X3 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0)) @ (esk8_3 @ X1 @ X3 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0)))|(admin @ X3)|~((rel @ X3 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0)))|~((rel @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53, c_0_54]), c_0_55])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_63, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X1:$i]:(((admin @ X1)|~((bob @ (esk7_3 @ X3 @ X1 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0))))|~((rel @ X1 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0)))|~((rel @ X3 @ X1)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56, c_0_54]), c_0_55])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_64, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X1:$i]:(((admin @ X1)|~((deletefile1 @ (esk8_3 @ X3 @ X1 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0))))|~((rel @ X1 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0)))|~((rel @ X3 @ X1)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57, c_0_54]), c_0_55])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_65, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((rel @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0) @ (esk7_3 @ esk5_0 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0) @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0)))|(deletefile1 @ X1)|~((rel @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0) @ X1)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58, c_0_59]), c_0_60])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_66, plain, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X12:$i]:(((bob @ X3)|(deletefile1 @ X12)|~((rel @ X1 @ X3))|~((rel @ X3 @ X12)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_61])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_67, negated_conjecture, (rel @ (esk7_3 @ esk5_0 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0) @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0)) @ (esk8_3 @ esk5_0 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0) @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62, c_0_59]), c_0_45])]), c_0_60])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_68, negated_conjecture, ~((bob @ (esk7_3 @ esk5_0 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0) @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63, c_0_59]), c_0_45])]), c_0_60])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_69, negated_conjecture, ~((deletefile1 @ (esk8_3 @ esk5_0 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0) @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64, c_0_59]), c_0_45])]), c_0_60])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_70, negated_conjecture, (rel @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0) @ (esk7_3 @ esk5_0 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0) @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65, c_0_54]), c_0_55])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_71, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~((rel @ X1 @ (esk7_3 @ esk5_0 @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0) @ (esk3_2 @ esk5_0 @ esk5_0))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66, c_0_67]), c_0_68]), c_0_69])). 16.33/2.51 thf(c_0_72, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_70, c_0_71]), ['proof']). 16.33/2.51 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 16.33/2.51 # Parsed axioms : 63 16.33/2.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 16.33/2.51 # Initial clauses : 48 16.33/2.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 33 16.33/2.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 15 16.33/2.51 # Processed clauses : 4969 16.33/2.51 # ...of these trivial : 270 16.33/2.51 # ...subsumed : 1470 16.33/2.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 3229 16.33/2.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 16.33/2.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 16.33/2.51 # Backward-subsumed : 185 16.33/2.51 # Backward-rewritten : 283 16.33/2.51 # Generated clauses : 63917 16.33/2.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 53478 16.33/2.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 16.33/2.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 63 16.33/2.51 # Paramodulations : 63888 16.33/2.51 # Factorizations : 28 16.33/2.51 # NegExts : 0 16.33/2.51 # Equation resolutions : 0 16.33/2.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 16.33/2.51 # Propositional check models : 0 16.33/2.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 16.33/2.51 # Propositional clauses : 0 16.33/2.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 16.33/2.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 16.33/2.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 16.33/2.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 16.33/2.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 16.33/2.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 16.33/2.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 16.33/2.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 16.33/2.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 2745 16.33/2.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 121 16.33/2.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 16.33/2.51 # Negative unit clauses : 262 16.33/2.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 2362 16.33/2.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 47870 16.33/2.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 226176 16.33/2.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 16.33/2.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 484 16.33/2.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 418324 16.33/2.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 221373 16.33/2.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1266 16.33/2.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 56858 16.33/2.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 16.33/2.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 255 16.33/2.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 59 16.33/2.51 # Condensation attempts : 4969 16.33/2.51 # Condensation successes : 2 16.33/2.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2113874 16.33/2.51 16.33/2.51 # ------------------------------------------------- 16.33/2.51 # User time : 1.997 s 16.33/2.51 # System time : 0.044 s 16.33/2.51 # Total time : 2.041 s 16.33/2.51 # Maximum resident set size: 2008 pages 16.33/2.52 EOF